1.
Chapters in Section V identify trends and issues
in IDT in various contexts: business & industry; military; health care
education; P-12 education; and post-secondary education.
Select at least 3 of these 5 contexts and
compare/contrast the IDT trends and issues.
Military
Trends Issues
New Technology Funding
Responsibilities design
constraints
Partnerships training
Lifelong learning
P-12 Education
Trends Issues
NTeQ model Technology
Integration
ASSURE Model Collaboration
Evaluation Training
Research based funding
Post-Secondary Education
Trends Issues
Faculty and training tension and
timelines
Instructional Design Model funding
Plan and delivery information
Leadership
Service
Integrate technology
Information that is is similar are funding,
all given by the government and directed to train the person or students. There is necessary time line that is set to
get the information to use for protection, graduation or for grading or
teaching to get to the next level in a position. They types of models used vary in each area
it really doesn’t say if the post-secondary used research based training. Trainers’ job descriptions are not exactly
the same either.
Then explain how they are similar or
different from the IDT trends and issues in the context in which you work.
My IDT
Trends Issues
Technology faculty
and training
Plan and delivery funding
Research based Timelines
Collaboration
Integrate
technology
In the public school where I work the
issues are the same as in the P-12. The
major issue in my opinion is the faculty training when the new technology is
brought the campus. Teacher use the
technology only when necessary or forced to use it if they are not comfortable
with the computer. When also affects the integration of the technology with
lessons. Each instructional design is
supposed to be research based but in education the trends go so fast that none
of the issues will be solved if it doesn't give the quick fix.
2.
Chapters in Section VI discuss global trends and
issues in IDT. As the world’s population grows exponentially, we face
unprecedented challenges that have implications for learning.
How
and can we prepare our youth to address the problems of living in a world with
9 billion people when the earth’s resources cannot sustain that many?
2A. we must take the stance that using less
has to become more. This to me is a political issue that some do not believe. We
are aware of our problem but, we do not own up to the creation of the problem. We need to truly teach our children to
integrate the past with the present.
This happens every time the lights go out on a campus. A true teacher can teach without the computer
and the web vs. one that breaks into a breakdown of what do we do now? We are
not taking care of the earth and its resources or teach our youth the true
consequences of what is happening because we are not. Technology although is wonderful but it is
also a culprit of the destruction of our ecosystem. Let’s get back to the
basics use the technology to teach them boy/girl scouts techniques so when the
computer or electricity goes out it won’t be a shock.
2B. Does our current education system,
curriculum, and instructional practices help learners foster the complex
problem-solving skills necessary to tackle these issues?
No, the present educational system teaches
them to look up someone else’s solution and use it not to use trial and
error. Some of it also says there is
only one answer to the problem when there may be multiple choices. We have lost our free thinkers. It is said and the teachers hands are tied by
tests that regulate the curriculum and graduation and teacher’s pay checks in
Texas.
Are
there methods and practices used in European and Asian countries that we should
use here in the US? Why or why not?
We are already using the methods that
Europe is using in my opinion. We use
the individualized learning with learning disabled students and our Talented
and gifted students. Some schools have
adapted the curriculum to programmed lessons on purchased websites upgraded
from CD’s. So there is no Magic
Dust. It is all the same thing just a
name change. RTI is the new name for what was already happening.
Computers and internet activity is now almost
the norm in school districts but teachers are not required to pass an
equivalency test to use or teach technology unless it is your area of expertise
in education .
Hi Leisa, this is very insightful, the common issue trend is lack of money and time, and it seems we have taught our children very little on the use of both the money and time wisely. The students are not prepared to meet with the challenges of this world once they are of school, it is kind like the students are being spoon fed. Everything has it's bad side, technology is not an exception, while we all benefit from it, it also has it's share in the damaging of the ecosystem. I enjoyed reading your blog.
ReplyDelete